There is nothing comparable to OpenAI’s pursuit of a computer science student over an open source GPT-4 project. OpenAI was originally a non-profit research organisation. Although it may seem ludicrous, it is real. Creators of chatGPT have threatened student Xtekky with legal action if he does not take down his GPT-4 free GitHub repository.
A European computer science student who manages the chatGPT 4 free project on GitHub purportedly received a letter from OpenAI. Demands, according to OpenAI, that he remove the project within five days or risk legal action.
GPT-4 free provides free access to the GPT 4 and GPT 3.5 models by routing the queries through websites like You.com, Quora, and CoCalc and collecting the replies.
Additionally, each website using GPT4 free pays OpenAI fees to use its extensive language models. However, because of the script, those websites end up paying for users’ queries even though no one visits them.
The pupils, however, are unsatisfied and feel that they are not responsible for what others do. They contend that if he uses the APIs of other websites, OpenAI shouldn’t be focusing on him. These APIs, however, are currently accessible unencrypted on the public internet.
Additionally, he added that each website that sent him an email was responsible for protecting its APIs.
Xtekky has advised OpenAI that “if they want it taken down, they should file a formal request with GitHub instead of sending threats to him” and that he intends to maintain the repo despite the legal threat.
In fact, GPT 3’s rapid growth marked a crucial turning point in AI research, and it is largely regarded as the most potent language model yet created.
The model has the capacity to be utilised for a variety of applications, including chatbots, content generation, and language translation. It is effective enough to write coherent, human-like writing in response to instructions.
Recently, OpenAI launched chatGPT-4, a modified version of GPT-3 that is much more effective and potent. Users must either discover a service similar to OpenAI that has paid to include GPT-4 into their own solutions or pay for GPT plus access via OpenAI’s API in order to use GPT-4.
In contrast, GPT-4 GitHub project supplied a fourth choice to the specified selections. But the case has faced legal action from OpenAI.
OpenAI’s decision to send a notification to the student who leads the GPT-4 project has concerns about the company’s approach to intellectual property and its engagement with the AI research community.
According to many people, OpenAI should be available for its users d make it more accessible and favourable for developers and researchers.
In contrast, many have stated their opinions by arguing the firm has a right to safeguard its intellectual property and that the GPT-4 free initiative is a violation of that asset.
Alas, the whole scenario demonstrates how crucial it is to safeguard the APIs and assures that it is only accessed by the authorized parties. To safeguard their APIs and make sure that only authorised users use them, developers must take action.
